Archive for the ‘Journalism’ Category

Test Your Grammar IQ

Monday, August 2nd, 2010

Who doesn’t relish a challenge, especially when it comes to dependent clauses, parallelism and collective nouns? OK, so that’s a stretch, but go with it. Find the errors in the sentences below and I’ll send you a fabulous prize. Not really, but what have you got to lose?

  • Neither an e-mail or a phone call to the family were returned immediately.

“Neither” is a correlative conjunction, which means it always pairs with “nor.” I also threw in an agreement trick. “Were” is incorrect – it should be “was.” Corrected, the sentence is, “Neither an e-mail nor a phone call to the family was returned.”

  • Marketers say they will devote 41 percent of their 2010 budgets to TV advertising, compared to 51 percent two years ago.

“Compared to” and “compared with” are not interchangeable. Use “compared to” when comparing two or more items that are similar. For example, “She compared her work for the disabled sailors’ organization to her efforts to connect service dogs with wheelchair-bound adults.” Use “compared with” when juxtaposing two or more items to illustrate similarities or differences. The example I provided above should have used, “compared with.”

  • The car moved backwards into oncoming traffic and the impact was really loud.

Although you might think about changing “impact” since incorrect use of the word is a big peeve for me, I threw that in to trip you up. “Backwards” should be “backward.”

  • The way it looks now, he will not be traveling to see his sister since he doesn’t have any money.

I threw this one in as an example of bloat. There’s no reason to write, “he will not be traveling to.”  Instead, write, “The way it looks now, he will not visit his sister because he doesn’t have any money.” Succinct is usually better.

  • The general consensus is that we should close the store next year.

“General consensus” is redundant.

  • If bloggers could figure out a way to monetize their writing, they would be better able to make a living.

Words that end in “ize” are jargon. Please eliminate “monetize,” “monetization” and the like from your copy. Instead, use “revenue,” “make money” or “profit from.”

How did you do? Even if you missed some of these, don’t give up on grammar, style and punctuation. By investing a little time and effort into learning and breaking bad habits, you’ll get better. I’m sorry I don’t have a giveaway, but your reward will be better business communications – and that can only help your company.

  • Share/Bookmark

Preposition snafus, plurals and other grammar missteps

Monday, July 26th, 2010

Since newspapers seemingly can’t afford to hire more copyeditors, the ones who are still at the helm are probably overtaxed. I don’t have to hunt for errors anymore – they pop right off the page. I finally finished reading a stack of issues of The Wall Street Journal that had been piling up while I was on vacation and found several mistakes:

July 18

“The Trouble With Teacher Tenure” – Saturday detention for this headline writer. The trouble is he or she forgot there’s more than one teacher in this country. It should be, “The Trouble With Teachers’ Tenure.”

July 14

“Planning for the Unthinkable” – The text in the headline is fine, but the individual who laid out the page put “Planning” and “for” on the first line and “the Unthinkable” on the second deck. So much for not ending headlines with prepositions. Rewrite the headline or move “for” to the second line. (This was in a dreaded “special section,” which in reporters’ parlance, means copy the newsroom has to churn out to fill ad space. Translation: No one read it.)

“He argues that this was even more intrusive ‘because it was done without the knowledge of customer.’” The genius that didn’t catch this mistake must be the same one who believes that only one teacher is working. The error is included in a story about privacy concerns associated with smart phones. Smart-phone makers obviously have more than one customer. (By the way, Associated Press style is smart phones, two words. This is relevant for the next example.)

June 16

In a single issue, the newspaper referenced “smart-phones” and “smartphones.” The paper’s style is “smartphones,” one word.

June 15

“Brown Rice Linked to Lower Diabetes Risk.” The issue here is that the paper ended the first deck of the headline with the preposition, “to.”

That’s enough picking on The Wall Street Journal for now. I need to spread the wealth.

  • Share/Bookmark

The newsroom: Another view

Friday, July 23rd, 2010

The newsroom: Another view

When I’m wrong, I’ll admit it. I’ve never been one to shy away from ‘fessing up to my mistakes. My post on Wednesday about my former newsroom ruffled some feathers. One of the editors pointed out that a two-hour visit is not enough time to assess the current state of the paper or its staff. All I know is what I saw and heard, but it seems I rushed to judgment.

With her permission, I’m sharing some of her thoughts:

“Yes, you were there on a bad day, but that doesn’t tell the full story. We have made no staff cuts. We are down one reporter through a resignation, but are actively looking for a replacement. There were few reporters and editors there that day because of vacation and other days off – the latter a mandate to prevent permanent layoffs companywide. There are plenty of people there to put out the paper.”

When I worked there, it was sometimes a struggle to get supplies, such as reporters’ notepads and pens, but we didn’t have to take unpaid leave. So that is new. And it’s not just happening here – it’s occurring in other newsrooms as well. And the day I visited, the overall atmosphere was nothing like it was back in the day. It was subdued and quiet. But as the editor noted, it was a bad day.

She went on to highlight the paper’s equipment and coverage of significant events. She’s proud of their achievements – rightfully so:

“Most of production is fully automated these days. We have top-of-the-line equipment that is operated by the best people. You should have also seen the full (the late U.S. Sen. Robert C.) Byrd coverage. It was comprehensive and among the best. Did you see any of our coverage of the explosion at the Upper Big Branch mine in April? It was top flight. We are also in the midst of putting together a special series on the disaster.”

The editor conceded that the building needs work, as I wrote, but said the buckled floor will be repaired soon.  

In closing, she wrote that the paper is among the largest and most profitable in its group and that the staff still puts out a great issue every day.

“I just want you to see things through my eyes,” she said.

  • Share/Bookmark

Newsrooms go dark

Wednesday, July 21st, 2010

Newspapers across the country are suffering from hard times. Many of their editorial staffs are forced to take unpaid furlough days every quarter and contend with a multitude of other cutbacks. It’s no secret that shareholders’ relentless pursuit of increasing profits and the industry’s burying its head in the sand about the Internet spurred the crash.

Still, it was a sobering and sad occasion for me last month when I visited the West Virginia daily where I worked for eight years. Half the lights in the newsroom were burned out and had been so for some time, and the floor had buckled in a couple of places. The solution: Mark the areas with orange cones. It seemed permanent.

Even more disconcerting was the silence. It was like a cemetery. And this was the morning the news broke of the late U.S. Sen. Robert C. Byrd’s death. The place should have been a beehive of activity. Byrd was an important figure in West Virginia’s history and in the U.S. Senate, having served the longest congressional term in history.

I was prepared for bad. I didn’t expect the worst. The newsroom was virtually empty. Reporters weren’t scurrying around trying to make deadline or huddling with editors in strategy planning sessions. By late afternoon, at least two of the editors had left for the day. No one was working the phones. In fact, I wondered who was even putting out the paper and if they could afford to print the issue given that they couldn’t keep all the lights on.

In the late ‘80s and early ‘90s when I worked there, a big news day like that was an exciting, adrenaline-filled rush. My former co-workers that I keep in touch with know what I’m talking about. I’m not just being romantic about it either. We were a cohesive and talented group of reporters, editors, copyeditors, photographers and page designers who lived, ate and breathed newspapers. We got up each day charged and ready to uncover the next big story. The newsroom thrived and so did we.

Not anymore.

  • Share/Bookmark

Take your pick – back of the house or front row

Thursday, June 10th, 2010

Who likes sitting in the nosebleed section at a concert? The sound bites and you can’t see the band. The only benefit is that you’re closer to the beer stands and the bathrooms.

The White House briefing room is obviously smaller than a concert venue with only seven rows and 49 seats. The coveted front row is arguably the only section that counts. And the stakes are high. These are assigned to the mainline brass in the White House Press Corps. They are called on first when they have questions, while the reporters who are relegated to the back are ignored.

Since the dawn of time, Helen Thomas, who just retired after making anti-Semitic comments, has occupied the best seat in the house – the middle, front row. She always got to ask the first question at press conferences and had been on the job so long, I thought she’d be entombed there. The jockeying for her seat has begun in earnest and it’s an entertaining spectacle. Some days, I miss being a reporter, but the day the lobbying began isn’t one of them. I think the campaign was under way even before her chair was cold.

Bloomberg reporter Ed Chen told The Wall Street Journal this week, “It’s like musical chairs in elementary school, except it has the cutthroat viciousness of a snake pit.”

Pity the poor Talk Radio reporter who occupies the last seat in the back. You don’t stand a chance, pal. And Media News, which is in the sixth row, might as well quit now. No one knows who that is.

So which outlets have front-row seats? CNN, Reuters, ABC, CBS, the Associated Press and NBC. My hunch is that the FOX reporter, who has the middle second-row chair, doesn’t have a hope of moving up, given that we have a Democratic president who clearly spurns the network. I’m putting my money down on The New York Times, whose reporter sits in the second row.

No matter which contender is bestowed the honor of moving up, the more interesting battle could play out over who gets that newly vacated reporter’s seat. The White House Correspondents’ Association determines the pecking order. Care to place any bets?

  • Share/Bookmark

Style Guru

Wednesday, April 14th, 2010

Hand writingHell hath no fury like a woman with a new version of The Associated Press Stylebook

The Style Guru is breaking tradition by posting on Wednesday, but I’m a woman unleashed now that I have unfettered access to the online version of The Associated Press Stylebook. It seems the AP has updated the book a few times since I bought my last spiral-bound copy in 1998. I shelled out $25 for the new version yesterday and am still feeling like a kid in the candy store.

I could spend hours combing through the current edition. It’s fascinating stuff for the grammar-obsessed. Who knew you could hear pronunciations for people like Abu Musab Zarqawi and Aung San Suu Kyi and for places such as Tblisi and Pyongyang? Of course, you can’t get this feature in the old-fashioned desk guide — it doesn’t “talk.”

Some other things have changed, too. Over the last year or two, I’ve begun to realize just how many words and phrases we use that aren’t in my 1998 edition. And when I want to know the correct style for them, it’s a problem. Search engine optimization is a perfect example of a phrase that didn’t exist in 1998. Thanks to my current Stylebook, I now know that the phrase isn’t hyphenated. Thank goodness – not knowing how to treat it has been driving me nuts.

How about the populist movement that opposes the Washington political establishment? It wasn’t around 12 years ago. How do you refer to it? It’s known as the tea party. That’s right – no quote marks, no capitalization. Another mystery solved.

The book’s editors also set the record straight when it comes to the annoying trend of late, which is to make Internet-related terms single words. That’s right, e-mail still needs a hyphen; Web site is still two words; e-reader takes a hyphen; and Web pages is still two words. This is a goldmine, people.

I could go on and on, but no one else besides for grammar and style nerds truly appreciates this stuff. (Hint: I’m one of them!) At least I’m sparing you the torture of reading a multipage hyphen manifesto such as the one the former copydesk chief at the beleaguered Milwaukee Journal Sentinel wrote. That doesn’t mean I haven’t thought about it.

Happy reading, fellow grammarians!

  • Share/Bookmark

This just in: News on autopilot

Monday, April 12th, 2010

robotOne of my former newspaper colleagues just got the axe for the third time in as many years. He was among more than 40 editorial employees who were let go in a single day. A friend at another daily is mulling accepting the next buyout before she ends up on the cutting-room floor.

New casualties are happening every day across newsrooms large and small, which begs the question, who will cover the school board, city council and other vital government meetings, and court hearings that form the nuts and bolts of daily newspapers’ coverage?

When all the reporters are gone, who’s going to alert the public when the Stick-it-to-the-Taxpayer Commission votes in a closed-door session to approve an 80-percent across-the-board property tax hike in Your Town? Who’s going to be sure that Defendant Joe Six Pack gets a fair trial before Judge Ultra Sneaky? Who will write the editorials that pressure Governor Corrupt to resign? 

I guarantee you it won’t be Suzie Blogger. I don’t think most bloggers give a hoot about the daily grind that reporters cover in the public’s interest. School board meetings and sentencing hearings are just not sexy enough for most people who fancy a writing career on the Internet. And when no one’s watching anymore, look out.

Don’t worry, though. I have a solution that will replace the dwindling ranks of professional journalists and keep the public up to date on all the news. Since Steve Jobs apparently hasn’t thought of it yet, I’d like to offer him a stake in my new invention: The Autopilot Reporter. It works 24/7, it doesn’t talk back, it can’t form a union and it reports without bias. The 3G model will even provide instant online updates without begging for more time to finish the last paragraph.

I anticipate that my invention will be in such great demand, that I’ll have the capital to create an Autopilot for every profession. Hey, airlines use them, why can’t every company? We can all accept lucrative buyout packages, quit our jobs and move to Bora Bora, where we’ll live out our lives sipping umbrella drinks and reminiscing about the good old days before we became obsolete. Long live automation!

So who wants in? Send me your contact info and I’ll get back to you – just after I punch in this last story.

  • Share/Bookmark

A little experience goes a long way

Tuesday, March 16th, 2010

As more journalists are forced into the unemployment lines, a virtual army of bloggers and nontraditional news outlets are cropping up, sometimes overnight. Some believe these enterprising ventures could eventually replace industry stalwarts such as The Associated Press or Reuters.

I don’t begrudge them new opportunities to earn a living, but I would caution the reading public to consider the source. Long-standing, proven media outlets are – for the most part – credible in their reporting and expertise. Upstarts aren’t nearly as transparent and the writers don’t always have the training, personal experience or professional qualifications that skilled journalists bring to the table.

Whether they write for blogs, newspapers, magazines, news feeds or other outlets, authors have a basic responsibility to make sure they are qualified to write about their chosen topics. It’s essential to earning readers’ trust and respect. Writing from personal experience alone will get you only so far.

  • Share/Bookmark

Mixing fairy dust, luck and a dash of genius for good writing

Tuesday, March 9th, 2010

fairyWhen I go to the library, I scan the new-book shelves for intriguing-looking titles. More often than not, I decide whether I’ll check them out by reading the first paragraph or two. If the writing is good, I’m instantly hooked.

I feel the same about blog, newspaper and magazine articles. If the content appeals to me from the start, I’ll keep going. If not, I’ll skim for anything useful. If I’m in a real hurry, I might skip them entirely. Of course, it’s all subjective – what’s good in my opinion wouldn’t necessarily appeal to someone else.

On top of their game

Some of the best writers are people I’ve worked with over the years, and they’re still producing outstanding work that makes me proud to know them. Consider an example from Dave Sibray, general manager of The West Virginia Explorer. Dave writes much more than Wikipedia-style content for his Web site. When I read the opening to his unfinished story about a lost rural town, I was awestruck. Like a caffeine addict who craves the next cup, I wanted more:

“Hundreds of communities in West Virginia might justifiably be termed ‘lost towns.’ Only the odd foundation or teetering chimney stands where their mills and mines once rumbled. Yet one is exceptional. It appears on no map. It surfaces on no common record. This is its story.”

Unfortunately, I can’t share the rest with you because one of Dave’s sources became ill. I hope he can finish it one day and that he’ll send it to me. It’s a brilliant beginning that deserves a middle and an ending.

Rachel Zallon David, another former colleague who is a reporter for the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, wrote an outstanding piece about her quest to learn how to play the piano. But it was so much more than that. She did what the best writers do – Rachael tapped into her personal experience and shared it with readers:

“When I first stepped into Fred’s parlor for piano lessons six years ago, I was looking for a challenge. As it would turn out, I got much more. I wanted to learn piano. He was a piano teacher. I was 30. He was 88. … I admitted I couldn’t read a bass clef to save my life. I did not mention my unhappiness. One friend called it a mid-career crisis. Looking back on it six years later, I think I was disenchanted. So instead, I retuned Fred’s playful smile and told him I loved music. Not just listening to it, but playing it. I’m not sure I ever told anyone that before. He said loving music was beautiful. I believed him.”

I won’t tell you how the story ends, but you can read it in full here. Grab some tissues; you’ll need them.

More winners

I’m an avid reader of sailing books since that is one of my passions in life. I’m angling for a long-distance journey that takes me far away from the Chicago skyline, but that’s another story for another day. If you scan the book shelves in the adventure and sports sections of any library or bookstore, you’ll find an abundance of titles in which the authors share their tales of navigating the high seas.

One book, however, Alvah Simon’s North to the Night, stands out from the crowd because of the incredible story and exceptional writing. He set sail for the Arctic Circle and became trapped in ice on his boat 100 miles from the nearest settlement. He emerged several months later a changed man. The first paragraph grabbed me:

“Heavy winds howl off the Inussualuk Glacier, whipping Tay Bay into a winter tantrum, trying to huff and puff and blow my house down. How long has this blizzard blown – two, three days now? What does it matter? The sun vanished months ago, leaving this wasteland cloaked in blackness and life-sucking cold. An hour, a day, a week, they all feel the same to me, huddled in this sleeping bag, sealed in my solo tomb.”

More recently, I’m entranced with Neko Case’s work. Her song lyrics about love and wanting read like oblique poetry. “This Tornado Loves You” is a good example from her newest release, Middle Cyclone:

“Carved your name across three counties/And ground it in bloody hides/Broken necks will line the ditch/Till you stop it/Stop it/Stop this madness/I want you/I have waited with a glacier’s patience/Smashed every transformer with every trailer/Till nothing was standing/Sixty-five miles wide.”

The magic formula

So what’s the secret to writing in a way that entertains, inspires, engages, educates and elevates reading to a new level? Start with a bowl of fairy dust, add a few prayers and a dash of genius, and mix in a little luck and you’ve got the makings of a success story. The real secret is (drum roll, please) that there is no magic bullet. A number of strategies, however, can help writers improve their craft. I’ll cover some of these in a future post, so stay tuned.

  • Share/Bookmark

Bringing print back from the grave

Tuesday, March 2nd, 2010

headstoneI was gratified to see three other people reading daily newspapers – yes printed newspapers – on the “L” this morning. Someone else besides me clearly does not depend on a mobile phone to catch up on world events. A little more than a quarter of American adults now read news on their cell phones, according to a Pew Research Center report released March 1.

The survey shows that people are changing how they get information. At the same time, however, five major magazine publishers are uniting to promote the power of print in a dramatic way. Surprisingly, they’re digging in their heels and pitching in on a multimillion-dollar national ad campaign that will make a case that print trumps the Internet. They maintain that the Web’s content is fleeting and is too much of a moving target.

This sea change is confusing because in the not-so-distant past, the magazine industry invested significant time and effort into trying to prove it could hold its own against digital publishers. They touted e-zines and other formats as being the wave of the future. Whether magazine publishers are abandoning these efforts in favor of trying to attract and retain niche audiences is unclear. What is clear, however, is that the Internet is expected to continue to drain more ad dollars from traditional media.

I don’t know how people can stand to read anything but the weather forecast and maybe the scores from last night’s games on a tiny cell phone screen, but more power to them. How do you get your news? Do you skim or read entire articles on your phone?

  • Share/Bookmark