Archive for the ‘Advertising Strategy’ Category

Webisode watch

Wednesday, August 18th, 2010

The line between entertainment and advertising has become increasingly blurry over the years. First came product placements – now shamelessly crammed into Hollywood blockbusters and even music videos. Then the viral video craze, masterminded by corporate marketers and agencies that sought to make something authentic, humorous and entertaining enough that viewers would share it.

Now comes the latest development in the war against DVR junkies like me, who fast forward through millions of dollars worth of TV spots without a second thought: The Web series phenomenon. It’s been gaining speed over the last couple years, and some have been wildly successful (Ikea, American Family Insurance and Kraft) while others never stood a chance (Maybelline, Palm Pre and Kodak).

A recent Ad Age article analyzes these campaigns and begs the question: Are these efforts actually generating sales or are they just offering Web content that is merely entertaining enough that viewers will overlook blatant commercialization? I marveled at the idea for “In the Motherhood” as much as the next marketer, but Ad Age poses a valid question. Do you think the Web series idea is a fad or an effective advertising channel that’s here to stay?

  • Share/Bookmark

The commercial your commercial could smell like: But do you want it to?

Wednesday, July 28th, 2010

By now, you’ve probably seen, or at least heard about, the viral explosion that is the “Old Spice Guy.” If you’ve been held hostage in a remote cave somewhere for the last few months, allow me to enlighten you:

By all accounts, consumers are thoroughly entertained and advertising and media industry professionals have lauded the campaign. Unfortunately, it doesn’t seem to be selling the product it was created for.

While the TV commercials and viral videos have enraptured – the YouTube campaign has garnered more than 12 million hits so far – sales of Old Spice Red Zone After Hours Body Wash are actually down a whopping 7 percent, according to the SymphonyIRI Group.

Isaiah Mustafa, the star of the videos, is cashing in on a recently signed NBC talent deal, but the bigwigs at Procter & Gamble may be scratching their heads trying to figure out how one of the most successful corporate viral campaigns of the year, at least in terms of popularity and praise, has failed so badly at moving product.

As a Yahoo! article on the topic points out, this isn’t the first time a media darling like the Old Spice Guy has been unable to translate to real revenue. Anyone who has read the renowned Hey, Whipple, Squeeze This: A Guide to Creating Great Ads knows that the ads industry pundits rip apart and that have consumers reaching for the remote are sometimes the most successful in terms of generating sales.

So how the heck can advertisers win when the “good” ads aren’t working and the products in the “bad” ads are flying off the shelf?

Well, Luke Sullivan, the author of the aforementioned Whipple (which I highly recommend, by the way) hypothesizes that commercials like the book’s namesake comes from – which coincidentally was also a P&G campaign – are successful because they annoy the crap out of us. Think about it: What’s worse than getting that grating yet impossibly catchy commercial jingle from your local car salesman/carpet cleaner/furniture store stuck in your head? While eye-roll inducing, I’ll bet the offender’s is the first name that pops into your head when you need a car, sofa or steam cleaning.

Sullivan quickly counters however, that just because these ads sell, doesn’t mean copywriters and designers should aim to create cheesy, repetitive, all-around-awful ads. There is a middle ground between selling and creating fresh, inspired and entertaining campaigns – and being a good advertising professional is all about finding it.

P&G may never pinpoint the exact reason why the Old Spice Guy couldn’t hock body wash, but it’s a powerful lesson for the ad industry: The most popular kid in school doesn’t necessarily graduate at the top of his class.

  • Share/Bookmark

Are you promoting/defending your category?

Wednesday, June 16th, 2010

An interesting article from Ad Age contends that marketers spend way too much time worrying about their specific brands and not nearly enough on those brands’ categories.

Let’s say your company produces energy drinks. You just spent a boatload of cash on an ingenious, award-winning campaign, and your product is flying off the shelves. But wait! A study just released presents some convincing evidence that the main ingredient in most energy drinks (including yours) causes cancer and a host of other terminal diseases. Still want to pop open that can? Neither do your customers.

You could get rid of the ingredient and replace it with something less nefarious. But what if there is no viable replacement? Even if there is, you’ll spend millions more fighting the perception that your product contains carcinogens.

The moral of the story is not that you should continue selling your customers cancer-causing products. Rather, it is a reminder of the importance of being aware of the perceived negatives surrounding not only your products, but also the categories your products fall into, and to be prepared in the event that those categories face criticism.

This hypothetical example plays out in real life every day. Take the ongoing and uphill battle high-fructose corn syrup manufacturers face combating the ingredient’s bad reputation. Which leads us to another important message: Choose your categories wisely. “Corn sugar” or even “corn syrup” sounds much better than “high-fructose corn syrup,” Ad Age points out.

In contrast, companies can use categorization to their benefit. Ad Age uses the example of how yogurt brand Activia rode the coattails of the popular “pro-biotic” category to become one of the top three best-selling yogurts in the country.

No matter your industry, products or services, this lesson likely applies to you in some way. Be careful about how your products are categorized (whether purposely or inadvertently), understand the potential pitfalls of those categories and promote them while educating customers.

  • Share/Bookmark

In defense of print

Wednesday, May 26th, 2010

1195311_metal_type_from_letterpress_3As you can probably tell from many of my posts, I’m a big advocate of digital marketing. I’m extremely interested in how digital and social media can help clients improve their marketing efforts. And most of all, I firmly believe that every business these days, large or small, absolutely needs a Web site – or at least some sort of online presence.

You will also notice, however, that I have never advocated replacing print marketing collateral with digital. I do realize, though, that I’ve never actually given a proper shout-out to tried-and-true brochures, direct mail pieces and the like.

These pieces are effective and useful in many situations, and should be mixed with digital marketing efforts to create better-rounded, integrated campaigns. Here’s why:

  • Not everyone is always online. Contrary to my everyday reality, not everyone is glued to a computer screen all day. The construction and manufacturing industries, for example, have been slower to make the migration online, and many older executives in several industries are less likely to prefer e-mail and other digital communications over brochures, printed sell sheets and other print pieces. This may blow your mind: Twenty-one percent of Americans have never visited a Web site, sent an e-mail or used a search engine, according to a 2008 Parks Associates study.
  • People like something they can hold onto. Sixty-eight percent of adults feel more comfortable when they have something on paper, rather than on a screen, according to a survey by Harris Interactive. Need more specific proof? Sixty percent of b-to-b technology (yes, technology!) buyers reported that brochures influenced their purchasing decisions, according to a 2009 survey from Eccolo Media.
  • Longer sales cycles require constant reminders. Ever been haunted by a print piece that seems to linger on your desk for months? The brochure for that service you told yourself you would look into? The product sell sheet you saved for a time when you actually had the budget for it? That event you considered attending? You’ve likely saved both print and e-mail collateral because you thought the service, product or event it advertised might be of interest to you at a later time. However, chances are that while the e-mail got shoved deeper and deeper into the abyss of your inbox – eventually being forgotten forever – the print piece lingered around your desk or bulletin board as a lasting reminder.

Because sales cycles are generally much longer in the b-to-b world, marketing materials that linger can be extremely valuable. Print pieces also allow companies to increase the “stickiness” of their marketing efforts by providing the capacity to create something that is useful to their potential customers. A direct mail piece that includes a pocket-sized spec chart that contractors would find necessary, for example, would have much more staying power than an e-mail.

One more thing: Think you can solve the reminder issue by sending a million e-mails about the same subject? Maybe – but it’s more likely that you’ll only annoy and alienate your audience instead.

  • Print pieces stand out. Very few marketing e-mails can meet the attention-grabbing potential of creative, well-done (dare I say beautiful??) printed pieces. Right off the bat, they catch our attention enough for us to at least consider your offer – e-mails have far less capacity to do this. Not to mention, most of us receive far more e-mails than snail mail, making it even harder for e-mail communications to appear unique.

The bottom line: Print is a great marketing medium. So is digital. The key is finding the perfect mix that works for your company and customers.

  • Share/Bookmark

Bringing print back from the grave

Tuesday, March 2nd, 2010

headstoneI was gratified to see three other people reading daily newspapers – yes printed newspapers – on the “L” this morning. Someone else besides me clearly does not depend on a mobile phone to catch up on world events. A little more than a quarter of American adults now read news on their cell phones, according to a Pew Research Center report released March 1.

The survey shows that people are changing how they get information. At the same time, however, five major magazine publishers are uniting to promote the power of print in a dramatic way. Surprisingly, they’re digging in their heels and pitching in on a multimillion-dollar national ad campaign that will make a case that print trumps the Internet. They maintain that the Web’s content is fleeting and is too much of a moving target.

This sea change is confusing because in the not-so-distant past, the magazine industry invested significant time and effort into trying to prove it could hold its own against digital publishers. They touted e-zines and other formats as being the wave of the future. Whether magazine publishers are abandoning these efforts in favor of trying to attract and retain niche audiences is unclear. What is clear, however, is that the Internet is expected to continue to drain more ad dollars from traditional media.

I don’t know how people can stand to read anything but the weather forecast and maybe the scores from last night’s games on a tiny cell phone screen, but more power to them. How do you get your news? Do you skim or read entire articles on your phone?

  • Share/Bookmark

Pushing it?

Wednesday, February 10th, 2010

taco-bell-drive-thru-diet

I just finished reading an interesting article in Forbes about how advertisers may be pushing the boundaries of decency, honesty and even dignity in these tough times. Several companies grabbed headlines recently with outlandish campaigns: Taco Bell with its “Drive-Thru Diet” campaign, which stirred skepticism, annoyance and more than a few laughs, and Weatherproof Garment Co. with its unapproved use of Obama on a Times Square billboard ad, just to name a couple.

Kellogg shamelessly cashed in on the H1N1 scare last year by printing, “Now helps support your child’s immunity” on cereal boxes, until it came under fire from the Food and Drug Administration – and that’s not the first bold claim Kellogg has made about its cereals’ nutritional power.

My guess is that 2009 will also go down in advertising history as the year of the marketing feuds, marked by several companies’ cringe-worthy efforts to one-up the competition – most memorably AT&T and Verizon.

It seems that to some companies, the old adage, “all publicity is good publicity” rings truer than ever. While some may be genuinely clueless (cough, cough … Kellogg) my guess is that most companies that pull these stunts are prepared for backlash – and are willing to take it in exchange for a few minutes in the limelight.

The companies mentioned, however, are consumer companies. Have you seen this envelope-pushing trend – statements that stretch the truth, shocking or inappropriate marketing/ads, blatant competitor bashing – in b-to-b marketing? We’d love to hear the juicy details.

  • Share/Bookmark

www.wrongcompany.com

Tuesday, January 12th, 2010

1172174_67201835

We’re sticklers for spelling, punctuation and grammar at The Simons Group. But we’ll admit, we’ve mistyped or misspelled our fair share of URLs when looking for a company or Web site and ended up on an error page or another site entirely.

And if we’ve done it, you can bet your customers and prospects have done it as well.

“That’s what Google is for,” you may say. OK, but what if your company’s name is generic or several companies exist with the same or a similar name? Or perhaps you are still working on getting your SEO up to par. In these cases, buying several versions of your URL (.net, .org, .us, etc.), common or potential misspellings of your URL and even common wrong “guesses” about your URL may be a good idea. For example, if your company name is ABC Logistics, but your URL is www.abc.com, you may want to also register for www.abclogistics.com, www.acb.com, etc.

Reputation management is another way to use URL registrations in your marketing campaigns. Large consumer companies sometimes do this to combat bad publicity. Going back to the ABC Logistics example, you might buy www.abclogisticssucks.com. Obviously, you won’t want this URL to link to your site in any way, but simply owning the URL will prevent a disgruntled employee or customer from buying it and creating a negative site. Conversely, you can buy clever URLs for specific campaign purposes. For example, if our friends at ABC Logistics wanted to do a marketing or advertising campaign focusing on how easy they are to work with, they might buy www.easyasabc.com to set up a microsite related to the campaign.

These strategies don’t make sense for all companies, but since many URLs are cheap, registering URLs related to your business is a small investment that could have a big payoff.

  • Share/Bookmark

Counting on coupons

Tuesday, December 22nd, 2009

1098657_73187772

If you think coupons only appeal to housewives and broke college students, think again. Business executives and other b-to-b decision-makers aren’t immune to the lure of a great deal either.

Several large b-to-b brands, including Schneider Electric, have begun using coupons with reported success. And just the other day, I received a $100 “gift certificate” from Google to use toward any Adwords campaign — no strings attached, no minimum spend.

On average, e-mail campaigns that tout coupons have a 70 percent higher click-through rate than other e-mails from the same company, according to a 2009 white paper from Experian CheetahMail. The white paper stated, “While coupons sent to subscribers of loyalty programs and membership clubs continued to top the performance charts, campaigns targeting professional groups and wholesale buyers, many of which were business-to-business campaigns, showed notably high responses to coupons offered via e-mail.”

Schneider Electric has experienced this high response rate firsthand, according to an article in B-to-B Magazine. The company has seen a “high single-digit lift” in sales of refurbished products and close-outs that it sells through an online outlet, thanks to coupon campaigns, according to the magazine. In the article, one company representative shared what he has found to be the best offers. Generic percentage-off offers tend to work better than product-specific offers and free-with purchase offers, he says.

So how can you use coupons successfully in your next e-mail campaign? Read B-to-B Magazine’s e-coupons best practices here.

  • Share/Bookmark

Touchdown! How to score with decision-making b-to-b audiences

Wednesday, December 16th, 2009

645083_20550533

Several months ago, I received an e-mail from the Chicago BMA chapter about one of its MarketingMasters luncheons. The speaker, FedEx Managing Director of Advertising Steve Pacheco, discussed his company’s strategic sporting-event-related marketing efforts.

In a write-up about the seminar on the BMA Chicago Web site, Pacheco was quoted as saying, “Sports programming is where people go to relax. It’s rating-protected and puts up good numbers. The little bit of leisure time that [top executives] have, they spend watching quality sports.”

This idea intrigued me, but I hadn’t thought much about it until a few weeks ago, when I read another article about how b-to-b technology providers have found success concentrating their marketing efforts in sports-related media.

(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark